The Effect of Comparative Fault on Damage Awards

by

Comparative fault is a legal principle used in personal injury cases to determine the extent of each party’s responsibility for an accident. This principle significantly influences the damages awarded to plaintiffs in civil lawsuits.

Understanding Comparative Fault

Comparative fault, also known as comparative negligence, assigns a percentage of fault to each party involved in an incident. Instead of barring a plaintiff from recovering damages entirely, courts reduce the awarded damages based on the plaintiff’s own degree of fault.

Types of Comparative Fault Systems

  • Pure Comparative Fault: The plaintiff can recover damages regardless of their degree of fault, but the amount is reduced proportionally.
  • Modified Comparative Fault: The plaintiff can recover only if their fault is below a certain threshold, often 50% or 51%.

Impact on Damage Awards

In cases involving comparative fault, the damages awarded are adjusted based on the plaintiff’s percentage of fault. For example, if a jury awards $100,000 but finds the plaintiff 30% responsible, the final award is reduced to $70,000.

This system encourages defendants to present evidence of the plaintiff’s negligence and promotes fairness by acknowledging shared responsibility. However, it can also complicate the litigation process and lead to lower awards for plaintiffs with some degree of fault.

Many states in the U.S. follow either pure or modified comparative fault rules. For example, in California, the pure system allows recovery regardless of fault, while in New York, damages are barred if the plaintiff is more than 50% at fault.

Consider a car accident where both drivers are partially responsible. If the plaintiff’s damages are estimated at $50,000 and they are 20% at fault, the final award would be $40,000 in a pure comparative fault jurisdiction.

Conclusion

Understanding the effect of comparative fault on damage awards is crucial for both legal professionals and litigants. It ensures a fair distribution of responsibility and influences the strategies used in personal injury litigation.