The Legal Side of Gerrymandering: What Laws Are Involved?

by

Gerrymandering involves drawing electoral district boundaries to favor a particular political party or group. Legal challenges often arise when such practices are believed to violate constitutional principles or laws. Understanding the legal framework is essential for assessing the legality of district maps and potential reforms.

Constitutional Foundations

The U.S. Constitution provides the basis for legal challenges to gerrymandering. The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment prohibits districts that are drawn with discriminatory intent or effect. Courts have examined whether district maps dilute the voting power of certain groups.

Several laws and court decisions shape the legal landscape of gerrymandering. Notable among them are:

  • The Voting Rights Act of 1965: Protects against racial discrimination in voting practices.
  • The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Shaw v. Reno (1993): Addressed racial gerrymandering and established that districts cannot be drawn solely based on race.
  • The Supreme Court’s Ruling in Rucho v. Common Cause (2019): Declared partisan gerrymandering beyond the reach of federal courts, leaving states to handle such cases.

Legal challenges to gerrymandering often involve claims of violations of constitutional rights or federal laws. Courts evaluate whether district boundaries are drawn to unfairly favor one party or discriminate against voters. Some states have implemented independent commissions to draw district lines, aiming to reduce partisan bias and increase fairness.