Table of Contents
Imvelaphi Nokubaluleka Kobukhulu Obudingekayo Nobufanele Kumandla KaClaus Angokomthetho
I-Lifadial neFanet Clause, etholakala eSiphakamisweni I, iSiqendu se-8 Claus 18 soMthetho-sisekelo we-United States, ingenye yamalungiselelo aqondeke kakhulu kodwa abekwe ngokufingqiwe kumthetho-mthetho-sisekelo waseMelika. Inika uMkhandlu amandla "wenza wonke imithetho edingayo nefanele ukuthatha iMithetho engaphezulu, nawo wonke amanye amandla abekwe yile mithetho yomthetho ewumbuso kuhulumeni wase-United States, noma kunoma kunoma yimuphi uMnyango noma kunoma isikhulu sawo." Ivame ukubiza i-"Elast Claste," inikeza i-Bhungalayelo lokumisa umthetho ongacacishiwe kodwa obalulekile ekukhipheni amandla awo ahlukene. Lo mthetho ube yisisekelo sokwandisa igunya lombuso wombuso, ukusekela izimpikiswano ezingapheli ngezikhawu ezingapheli ngobubanzi zamandla ombuso wombuso wombuso, ukulinganisela okuhlala phakathi kwe-agnogoverse-se-se.
Imvelaphi Eqanjiwe: Ukulungisa U - Claus Ongcwele
I-Ceafred and Seant Claus yavela ekusebenziseni kwe-Constitution of the Constitution ka-1787. Izihambeli zabhekana nenkinga eyisisekelo: indlela yokwakha uhulumeni wezwe onamandla ngokwaneleyo okuxazulula izinkinga zesizwe kuyilapho ulondoloza inkululeko nokunqanda ubushiqela. Ngaphansi kweZihlokwana zeConfederation, amaKhomishane ayengenawo amandla okukhokha intela, ukulawula izentengiselwano, noma ukuphakamisa ibutho. Ingqungquthela yafuna ukuxazulula lobu buthakathaka, kodwa izihambeli eziningi zesaba ukunikeza igunya elikhulu kakhulu.
James Madison, ngokuvamile obizwa ngokuthi uBaba woMthetho-sisekelo, waqaphela ukuthi uhulumeni olinganiselwe ohlwini oluncane lwemibuso ethile obengeke uhlonyiswe ukusingatha izinselele ezingalindelekile. Federalist No. 44, wavikela umbhalo, waphikisa ngokuthi "isidingo esidingekile" ukugwema "isitishi esinezinkinga eziyingozi kakhulu" ebesingavela uma iKhongolo-kadentili lingathatha isinyathelo kuphela lapho igunya layo likhishwa ngokucacile. Isivumelwano sasiklanyelwe ukuvumela iSishaya - mthetho ukuba sikhethe izindlela zokufeza izinjongo zaso, uma lezo zisho ukuthi "semqondweni nefanele"""
Ukuzihlela ngokwako kwahlotshaniswa ngokucophelela ukuze kugwenywe ukudlula kude kabili. Kwesinye isandla, igama elithi "edict" lakhethwa ngaphezu kwemisho ebanzi kakhulu njenge "contenfient" noma "isebenziseka" ukuvimbela uKhongolose ekufuneni ukuqonda okungenamkhawulo. Ngakolunye uhlangothi, abakhi benqaba ukwakhiwa okuqinile okungadinga umthetho ukuba uqobo olubalulekile; baqonda ukuthi ukubusa kudinga ukwahlulela okusebenzayo. Ngaleyo ndlela i-gameternet ithatha isisekelo esiphakathi, ivumela ukuba i-Congress Congress isholonet okunengqondo okungachazeki ukuthi [[[] ihlelwe ngendlela efanelekile.
Ukuchaza Kwakuqala Nokuvela Kwamandla Asetshenziswayo
Impikiswano Esekuqaleni Ebhange Lase - United States
Ukuhlolwa kokuqala okukhulu kwale nombolo kwafika ngo-1791, lapho u-Alexander Hamilton ehlongoza ibhange lesizwe. Unobhala weSizwe uThomas Jefferson waphikisa ngokuthi uMthetho-sisekelo awugunyazanga ngokuqondile ukuba usungule ibhange, nokuthi iSichibiyelo seshumi elinesihlanu sagcina wonke amandla angagunya angenamthetho ezweni. Hamilton waphikisa ngombono obalulekile owabeka isisekelo samandla aqondenencazelo. Waphikisa ngokuthi u-Claus Callsces wanikeza igunya lokufaka ibhange ngoba yayifanelekile futhi ifanelekile""[FLTY:1] ukuthwala amandla omthetho okhutshelwe intela, ukuboleka, nokukhokha imali. Umbono ka-Hamilton, nomongameli we-Washington womthetho webhange. Lesi sibonelo sakuqala sabonisa ukuthi [FLT] yayisetshenziswa ngaphandle kwesivumelwano somthetho womthetho womthetho womthetho womthetho.
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): ICornerstone
Isinqumo seNkantolo Ephakeme uMcloch v. Maryland isalokhu iyincazelo eqinisekile ye-Fanety neFanety Claus. IJaji eliyinhloko uJohn Marshall, ebhalela iNkantolo evumelanayo, wakholelwa ukuthi uKhongolo lwalunamandla okushaya iBhange Lesibini lase-United States, ngisho nakuba lawomandla ayengahlelwanga eSiphakathini I. Marshall wacabanga ukuthi uMthetho-sisekelo uhloselwe ukukhuthazela iminyaka eminingi ezayo, futhi ekugcineni, ushintshelwe ezinkini ezihlukahlukene zezindaba zabantu."
Umbono waveza ukufundwa okukhulu kwamandla kahulumeni. Marshall wabhala ukuthi lolu phawu luthi "lunamandla" kunokuba lube yisivimbeli, futhi uMkhandlu ungasebenzisa noma yiziphi izindlela ezinganqatshelwe nguMthetho-sisekelo ukuze ufeze injongo engokomthetho. Wamemezela ngokudumile, "ukuphela makube ngokomthetho, makube phakathi kwemithetho-mthetho, futhi zonke izindlela ezifanele, ezivumelana ngokucacile nalokho kuqhubeke, okunganqatshelwe, kodwa okunencwadi nomoya womthetho-mthetho, kuwumthetho-mthetho. Lokhu kukhululwe emagunyeni ashiwoyo emfutho yemilongo yemibuso egcweleyo futhi okusabela ekudingezwayo kwezizwe njengoba kudingekile.
Kuyo lendaba efanayo, iNkantolo yalahla umzamo kaMaryland wokukhokha ibhange likahulumeni, imisa isimiso sokuphakama kukahulumeni ngaphansi kuka-Supremacy Claus. Isinqumo futhi sagcizelela ukuthi u-Claus odingekile noMfaneleyo akawona umthombo wamandla angenamkhawulo; izindlela kumelwe zibe [" ezishicilelwe ngokucacileyo" [ ekupheleni komthetho-mzimbululo futhi akumelwe ulahle amanye amalungiselelo omthetho-mthetho. Nokho umphumela wonke wawuwukwandisa izinga legunya le-conogame.
Icala Lenkantolo Ephakeme Elilulaza I - Claus’s Claus
IGibibons v. u - Ogden (1824) noBuso Bezentengiselwano
IJaji eliyinhloko uMarshall waphinde waphendukela ku-Fanect and Fact Claus e Gibbons v. Ogden ukuchaza ukufinyelela kwe-Chwelective Claus. INkantolo yasekela ukuthi uKhongolo lungalawula izentengiselwano zezwe lonke, kuhlanganise nokuhamba ngezinyawo, futhi leyomithetho kahulumeni ephikisana nomthetho kahulumeni. UMarshall wacabanga ukuthi amandla okulawula ibhizinisi "phakathi kwamaZwe amaningana" ngokuqinisekile ahlanganisa amandla okulawula imisebenzi [[FLT]:2] ephansi kakhulu ithonya intection shortry comst shortment shortment shorts shorty [[FLT] i-procential provicessourcer promential providentialssourvement provicesmential provity (otation)
United States v. Comstock (2010): Ukusebenzisa i - Claus kuMthetho Wesigebengu
Ku United States v. Comstock, iNkantolo yacabangela ukuthi iziKhomishane zingagunyaza yini isibopho somphakathi seziboshwa zikahulumeni eziyingozi ngobulili ngemva kokuphela kwesigwebo sazo. Abaningi bakholelwa ukuthi u-Faned Claus uvumela ukuboshwa okunjalo ngoba kwakuyindlela enengqondo yokuthwala amandla kaKhondlu-mfutho kahulumeni ukuze abangele ubugebengu nokujezisa. Umbono kaJustice Stephen Breyer wagcizelela ukuthi isigaba sinikeza iSishaya-Roundation "broup" ukuba ithathe izinyathelo ezihlobene "ngokuvamile" nokusetshenziswa kwamanye amagunya ahlukene. Icala lalenza kube ngokomthetho ezindaweni ezihlukene njengezahlulelo zomthetho zobugebengu, ukujeza komthetho wezomthetho, ukuthutha abantu.
National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (202): IMandate
Ukuhlolwa kwamuva kakhulu komthetho kuhlanganisa ukugunyaza kwe-Affordcable Care Act. INkantolo yasekela ukugunyaza ngaphansi kwamandla empoqo yombuso, kodwa umbono kaMahluleli Omkhulu uJohn Roberts ngokuphawulekayo wenqaba impikiswano yokuthi u-Claus ofanele noMfaneleyo kuphela ongathethelela lomthetho. Roberts wabhala ukuthi umthetho uvumela uKhongolo lwemithetho [FLD:0] ukuba lunikeze isiboniso [[FLT:]] [[FLT]] [isiboniso] [icala lalo] [[FLT]] [inkulumiso] [imfanelo] [imfanelo] [imfanelo] yalo lifaka futhi indima yayo enkulu ekuchazeni umthetho womthetho. Icala liqokomisa futhi ukungathi amandla akhona phakathi kwesimiso sombuso.
UClaus Emithethoni Yanamuhla: Ukufinyelela Ngomdlandla Nemiphumela Ewusizo
Izinkonzo Zokuphatha Ezizimele
Umbuso wanamuhla olawulayo usekela kakhulu ukuba khona kwawo ngenxa ye-Edict ne-Faned Claus. Umhlangano uye wasungula izinhlangano ezinjenge-Evironmental Protection Agency, i-Secreties and Exchange Commission, kanye ne-Federal Commissions ukuze ifeze imithwalo yayo ebaliwe. Nakuba uMthetho-sisekelo ungawakhulumi lamaqembu, usekela indalo yawo njengendlela yokuphoqelela imithetho kahulumeni kwezohwebo, intela, nokulondeka kwesizwe. Lesi sakhiwo sivumela iSishaya-Mvumelwa ukuba ibeke igunya ezinjwayezini ezingosini eziyinkimbinkimbi, uvumela ukuvumelana namaqiniso ayinkimbinkimbi ezomnotho ngaphandle kokufuna ukumiswa komthetho wemithetho esemthethweni.
Ukunakekelwa Kwempilo Nenhlalakahle Yomphakathi
Izinhlelo ezinjenge-Medicare, i-Medicaid, ne-Social Security ziqiniswa ngenhlanganisela yamandla emali ekhokhwa yi-Congress (Ingxenye ye-I, u-Claus I, i-Ecle 8, ne-Claus 1) no-Mafthiwe. I-metacity yenza ukuba i-Congress imise izimo zezimali zikahulumeni zezezimali nokumisa izimiso zokulawula ezilawula imboni yezempilo, idinga ukwaziswa, futhi ibeke imigangatho engcono. Ngokwesibonelo, i-Emergergency Medical Actal Commentat and Act (MTALA) idinga izibhedlela ezivumayo iMedicane ukuba zinikeze izindleko eziphuthumayo zokukhokhela. Nakuba ingabalwangalulanga ngokucacile, imithetho enjalo idinga ukusetshenziswa nokuvikelwa kahle kwamandla nokuvikelwa kwenhlala.
Ukulondolozwa Kwemali Nokuqina Kwezomnotho
Ngemva kwenkinga yezimali ka-2008, uMkhandlu wasebenzisa izibalo zawo zezimali nemali, uhlangene ne-Celaus Edict, ukuze usungule i-Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) futhi umise iDodd-Frank Wall Street Reformation kanye noMthetho we-Consumer Protection Act. Lemithetho ilawula amathuluzi ayinkimbinkimbi ezimali, iqondisa amabhange nezinyunyana zokuthenga, futhi ibangele ukuvikela kwabathengi. Izinkantolo zisekela izinyathelo ezinjalo, ziqaphela ukuthi izinselele zezomnotho zanamuhla zidinga ukusabela okuvumelana nokubanzi kwesimiso sezwe.
Ukulondeka Kwezwe Nezindaba Zakwamanye Amazwe
Umthetho usekela futhi amandla amakhulu oMkhandlu ezindabeni zakwamanye amazwe, ngisho noma uMthetho-sisekelo unikeza uMongameli amandla amaningi awezomthetho wakwamanye amazwe. Ngemithetho enjenge-National Security Act ka 1947, i-Congress yasungula uMnyango Wezokhuselo, i-CIA, ne-National Security Council. I-War Powers Resolution ka-1903, kuyilapho incintisana, incike ekutheni u-Claus u-Iacle njengomthombo wegunya lemithetho yokulawula ukusetshenziswa kwebutho lempi. [FLT: 0] HAMDI v. Rumsfeld, iNkathiwe inkantolo yaphawula ukuboshwa kwesivumelwano lapho iqinisekisa ukuthi uMkhandlu wesizwe ugunyazomthetho wokuthunga, njengesehlakalo oludingekile lokumemezela impi.
Izimpikiswano Ngokulinganiselwa Kwamandla Ombuso
Ukungathuthukisi Ukwakha
Kusukela ekusungulweni, imibono emibili encintisanayo iye yaguqula ukuchazwa kwe-Inict ne Meditation Claus. Abakhi abaqinile, belandela uJefferson, baphikisa ngokuthi isigqebhezana kufanele silinganiselwe kulezozinto ezingenakuguqulwa[ ukusebenzisa amandla adwetshiwe. Ngaphansi kwalokhu kufundwa, uMkhandlu awunakunquma ngaphandle kokuba ukuhlangana namandla akhethekile omthetho-mthethweni kuqondisiwe futhi kuphoqelele. Abakhi abangekho emthethweni, balandela uHamilton noMarshall, baphikisa ngokuthi isigqeqephu sinikeza icebo lokukhetha noma yiziphi izindlela [ ezihlobene ngokusemthethweni. Lokhu kuyaqhubeka ukuthonya izimpi ezingokomthetho phezu kwemithetho esendaweni elawula indawo.
ISichibiyelo Seshumi Nesimiso Sokusebenzela Uhulumeni
ISichibiyelo sika-Claus nesifanele sivame ukungqubuzana neSichibiyelo seshumi, esigcinelwe izifundazwe wonke amagunya angaphathiswanga uhulumeni kahulumeni. Abagxeki begunya likahulumeni elibanzi baphikisa ngokuthi isigamu, uma sichazwa ngokungakholeki, siqeda imingcele yamandla adwetshiwe futhi silulaza ubukhosi bukahulumeni. INkantolo Ephakeme ike yaphonsa lemingcele, njengaku United States v. Lopez[FLT] [195], lapho ishaya khona iSikole seGun-Free Schools Act ngenxa yokuthi ukuxhumana kwezentengiselwano kugcwele kakhulu. Ngokufana, i-v3] v [1997], iNkaampela yeNka yeNka ye-Amperencelment (195]) lapho ingenakusebenzisa khona ukukhipha umthetho wokuphatha izikhulu ngenxa yezikhulu. kodwa izikhulu ziyabonisa ukuthi izikhulu.
Imfuneko "Yesivumelwano": Hhayi Ngenye Indlela Nje
Isici esivame ukuqashelwa esiyingxenye yombhalo yigama "elifanele". NFIB v. Sebelius, uMahluleli omkhulu uRoberts wagcizelela ukuthi "kulungile" uphoqelela ukucindezelwa okuzimele ngaphaya "okudingekile". Umthetho ungase udingeke ukuze ufeze isiphetho somthetho-mfantu kodwa uqhubeke ungafanele ngoba uphula ukwahlukana kwamandla noma ukuphula ubukhosi bezwe. Ngokwesibonelo, ukubeka umyalo oqondile ezishaya umthetho kahulumeni wokumisa umthetho kahulumeni, kungaba okungafanele, ngisho noma kudingekile ukufinyelela umgomo kahulumeni. Lokhu "ukufaneleka" kwenezela ungwengwengwengwezo zomthetho ozibo.
Ukubaluleka Kwawo: Isizathu Sokuba UKhisimusi Abaluleke Namuhla
I-Claus Ebalulekile neFanet Claus ilokhu iyisisekelo sombuso waseMelika. Ngaphandle kwayo, uMkhandlu ubungeke ukwazi ukusabela ebunkingeni bezomnotho, ushintsho olusheshayo lwezobuchwepheshe, noma usongo lokuvikela lwesizwe. Zonke izinyathelo eziyinhloko zikahulumeni . kusukela ku-Cec Air Act ukuya ku-Afford Care Care Act ku-CHIPS kanye ne-Science Act //I-relies olwenzeka ukuba kuthethelelwe imininingwane elawulayo, imishini yokusekela izimali, nezakhiwo zokuphatha ezidlula ku-Ceac ebhalweni elingenalutho lomthetho.
Ngesikhathi esifanayo, isisho siyaqhubeka sidala impikiswano enzima engokomthetho nezombangazwe. Izimpikiswano mayelana nemithetho yabaqondisi, umbuso wokuphatha, kanye nobukhulu obufanele bamandla kahulumeni zivame ukubuyela emuva encazelweni "efunekayo nefanele". Izazi nabahluleli bayaqhubeka behlola ukuqonda kokuqala kombhalo, kanye nokuphikisana okuthile ngokufakwa okusekelwe kakhulu ekutholeni imikhuba esekelwe ekwakheni i-era kanye nezinye ezisekela indlela ephilayo yomthetho-mthetho ovumela uKhongolo ukuba luvumelane nomongo omusha.
Kubafundi bakahulumeni waseMelika, ukuqonda i-Edict and Fact Clause kubalulekile ekuqondeni indlela uMthetho-sisekelo oye washintsha ngayo kusukela epulanini emfushane waba isisekelo sikahulumeni wezwe onwebekayo. Kubonisa ukuhlakanipha kwabenzi bomthetho wokulawula ekuhlanganiseni amandla ahlelwayo ne-region evumelanayo enikeza imvume enikezayo − kanye nenselele engapheli yokulinganisela amandla kahulumeni nenkululeko.
" Isisho asiyona inhlolo engekho ye-Congress, kodwa siyithuluzi elibucayi lokuqinisekisa ukuthi uMthetho-sisekelo uhlala uyithuluzi elisebenzayo lokubusa." — Justice Anthony Kennedy (ekhona [ i-Chomstock)
Ukufunda Okwengeziwe
- [[NTL:0] Isikhungo solwazi lomthetho: Okudingwayo nokufanele u-Claus ukubuka ngokudlulisa [ — Ukukhomba okubanzi okungokomthetho emlandweni wesigeqe nomthetho wendaba.
- [FLT]] Izinqolobane zesizwe: Umbhalo Ogcwele womthetho-sisekelo wase-U.S. — Funda ibhukwana lokuqala, kuhlanganise ne-Athigin I, Ingxenye 8, Clause 18.
- [FLT]bergefell v. Hodges (2015) – Umbono Odidayo kuFederalism — Isibonelo sanamuhla sendlela ukuphikisana okulungile nokusemthethweni okuvela ngayo emacaleni aseNkantolweni Enkantolo Ephakeme.
- [FLT] Inkonzo yokucwaninga yoMnyango woMdaba: Idingeke noMfaneleko we-Claus Doctrine — ukucubungula okuphelele kwendlela yokusebenza kombhalo emthetho kahulumeni.
Isiphetho: Ukulinganisela Ukuvumelana Nesimo Nokuzilawula
Umlando wayo ubonisa ukuthi le mithetho isetshenziswe ekwakheni uhulumeni onamandla okwazi ukusingatha izinkinga zesizwe, kodwa futhi ukuthi imingcele yayo incintiswane futhi ilandelana. Njengoba iSishaya-mthetho siqhubeka sibhekene nezinselele ezintsha, i-Ellastic Clause ihlala iyindaba eyinhloko yempikiswano yomthetho-mthetho. Umbuzo oyinhloko awukho ukuthi i-Congress inezigunya elibonisa amandla, kodwa ukuthi lawo mandla awesizwe ayakwazi ukusingatha izinkinga zesizwe futhi avikela kangakanani. Impendulo iveza i-demodemocrali ye-Melika.