Table of Contents
Indima Engenakuxazululwa Yommeli Ekuhumusheni Umthetho Nokuvumelaniswa
Ijaji lisebenza njengomsunguli wokugcina wencazelo engokomthetho eUnited States, osebenza ngokuchaza imithetho edluliswa yizishaya-mthetho nezimiso ezikhishwa yizinhlangano zezobuphathi. Lo msebenzi awuwona nje umsebenzi owenziwa ngemishini; uyinqubo enamandla neyamaphikiswana elawula ukusebenza komthetho ezimpikiswaneni zezwe langempela. Ngokuchaza, izinkantolo ziphefumula ukuphila ezimisweni nasezimisweni, ziqinisekisa ukuthi zivumelana nezimiso zomthetho-mthetho, izinhloso zomthetho-mthetho, futhi zihlanganisa nezimiso ezingokwesiko. Lesi sihloko sihlola ukuchaza kwemithwali yemfanelo yejaji, amathuluzi nezimfundiso, nokusebenzisa ithonya elikhulu ezinqumweni zayo ezibusayo namalungelo abantu ngabanye.
Isisekelo Sencazelo Yokwahlulela
Inqubo yokwahlulela inqubo lapho izinkantolo zithola khona incazelo yemibhalo engokomthetho, imithetho kahulumeni, imithetho kahulumeni, imithetho kahulumeni, noma imithetho yokuphatha. Lendima ibalulekile esimisweni lapho imithetho ibhalwa khona ngemisho ebanzi futhi kumelwe isetshenziswe ezimweni ezithile, ngokuvamile ezingalindelekile. Izincazelo zejaji zinikeza isiqondiso esinegunya, ukuqinisekisa ukuthi umthetho usebenza ngokungaguquguquki futhi ngokungaguquki ezimisweni nakuzo ngokuhamba kwesikhathi.
UMthetho - sisekelo NjengoMthetho Ophakeme
UMthetho-sisekelo umi njengomthetho ophakeme wezwe ngaphansi kwe-Supremacy Claus (Artle VI). Wonke umthetho, kungakhathaliseki ukuthi udluliswa yiSishaya-mthetho noma umiswe isishaya-mthetho sombuso, kumelwe uvumelane nezimfuneko zomthetho-mthetho. Ijaji, ikakhulukazi iNkantolo Ephakeme, inegunya lokuchaza uMthetho-sisekelo futhi inqume ukusebenza komthetho. Leligunya, elaziwa ngokuthi ukubukeza komthetho, liqiniswe [[FLT]] Barbury v. [1803]) futhi lihlala liyitshe legumbi lomthetho womthetho-mthetho waseMelika. Isibonelo, [ku-FLT] i-Entevision v. Sebelius [FLT] [FFF] [3], ichaza iNkakhulu leNkathi yentela yomthetho-Clavicence.[ixf Active Activertical, ichaza i-Activessssmetic Active, i-Active, i-Actrive
Izindlela Zokuchaza Imithetho
Lapho kuchazwa imithetho, amajaji asebenzisa amathuluzi ahlangene abizwa ngokuthi amaphepha aphezulu okwakha. La maqembu asiza ekuxazululeni iziphakamiso futhi aqonde injongo yomthetho. Nakuba kungekho ndlela eyodwa esetshenziswayo emhlabeni wonke, izikole ezinkulu zomqondo zihlanganisa:
- Umbhalo: Lendlela igcizelela incazelo ecacile yombhalo wemithetho njengoba iqondwa umuntu onengqondo ngesikhathi sokumisa. Ababhula ngemibhalo, njengasemuva kukaMahluleli uAntonin Scalia, iphikisa ngokuthi umbhalo ngokwawo uwubufakazi obungcono kakhulu benhloso yomthetho, futhi abahluleli kufanele bagweme ukubheka umlando wemithetho noma izinjongo ezingokwezihloko. Ngokwesibonelo, Bostock v. Clayton County[[FF:3] 2020], iNkanto yasebenzisa umbhalo wokufundwa kweSihloko seSihloko seSihloko somthetho, futhi amajaji eSivumelo-Omthetho ka-Omthetho ka-19649 ukusekela ukuthi ukucwaswa kwemizwa kwezimiso zobulili noma isimo sobulili.
- Inhloso: Lendlela ifuna ukuveza inhloso engokomlando yabenzi bomthetho abadlulisa umthetho. Abahluleli bangabheka kwimibiko yamakomiti, izimpikiswano zaphansi, kanye neminye umlando wemithetho ukuze banqume ukuthi izishayamthetho zazisho ukuthini. Inhloso ivame ukugxekwa ngokuba yisithasi somthetho futhi ivumele amajaji ukuba asebenzise ubufakazi obungokomlando ukuze asekele imiphumela engcono.
- Purposivism: IProsivism igxila enjongweni ebanzi noma umgomo ongemva komthetho kunokuba ube yinhloso eqondile yabenzi bawo bomklami. Lendlela, esekelwa uMahluleli uStephen Breyer, ichaza ulimi ngokusekelwe ezinhloso zomthetho jikelele. Ingashintsha futhi ivumelane, njengoba ibonwa eSontweni elingcwele. United States[FLT][FLT] [1892]), lapho iNkantolo yenqaba khona ukusebenzisa umbhalo ongokoqobo wesigqebheko somthetho wemisebenzi yemisebenzi yezandla yangaphandle ngoba ibhuntshise injongo yezisebenzi ezivikelayo zaseMelika.
Ngokuvamile, amajaji ahlanganisa lezi zindlela, futhi ukukhetha ukuchaza kungawushintsha kakhulu umphumela wecala.
Ukubukeza Kokwahlulela: Amandla Okuhlasela Imithetho
Ukuhlola kokwahlulela kuyi-arhente yejaji enamandla kakhulu egunya lomthetho negunya lokulawula. Kuvumela izinkantolo ukuba ziqede imithetho nezenzo zezikhulu eziphula umthetho. Nakuba Marbury v. Madison wamisa lombuso wejaji likahulumeni, izinkantolo zikahulumeni futhi zihlola ukwahlulela ngaphansi kwemithetho yazo siqu. Izinga lokuhlola kokwahlulela lidlulela kuwo wonke amagatsha namazinga kahulumeni, kuqinisekiswe ukuthi akukho mthetho kahulumeni, umthetho kamongameli, noma umthetho wezwe uma ukhona.
Amacala Aphawulayo Ekubukezweni Kokwahlulela
Amacala amaningana eNkantolo Ephakeme aye achaza futhi athuthukisa ukusetshenziswa kokubukezwa kokwahlulela:
- Marbury v. Madison (103): Icala lokuqala lokuqinisa amandla eNkantolo Ephakeme ukumemezela isenzo sombuso ongekho emthethweni. INkantolo yasekela ukuthi i-Ceartic Act 13 ye- Judicial yango-1789 iphikisana neSigqeqephu III soMthetho-sisekelo futhi ngenxa yalokho yayingenalutho. Lesi sinqumo samisa ijaji njengegatsha elilinganayo negunya lokuchaza uMthetho-Mpathi.
- Brown v. Board of Education (1954): INkantolo yawisa imithetho kahulumeni elahla ukwahlukana ngokohlanga ezikoleni zomphakathi, ibusa ukuthi “ukuhlukanisa kodwa ulingane” akunandawo emfundweni yomphakathi ngaphansi kwe-Claus Sivikelo esilinganayo. Lesinqumo salawula Pnency v. Ferguson [186] futhi sabangela inguquko elungelweni lomphakathi.
- Roe v. Wade (1973): INkantolo yaqaphela ilungelo lomthetho-sisekelo lokweqa okuhlanganisa isinqumo sowesifazane sokuqeda ukukhulelwa. Nakuba kamuva yagumbuqelwa i-Dobs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization [202] [2002] [[FLT]] Roe ihlala iyisibonelo esiwuphawu lwendima yejaji elichaza amalungelo ayinhloko e-judicary.
- United States v. Nixon (1974): INkantolo ngazwi linye yakwenqaba ukusho kukaMongameli uNixon ilungelo eliphelele lokuvala amatepi aqoshiwe ekuhlolweni kwezenzo zobugebengu, iqinisekisa ukuthi akekho umuntu, ngisho noMongameli, ongaphezulu komthetho.
Ukubukeza kokwahlulela akunamingcele. Izinkantolo ngokuvamile zinamathela esimisweni sokugwema komthetho-mthetho-sisekelo, chaza imithetho ukugwema imibuzo yomthetho-sisekelo noma nini lapho kungenzeka. Ngaphezu kwalokho, imibuzo yezombangazwe nezimpikiswano ezibhekiswe enqubeni yezinye amagatsha zingabhekwa njengezingafanelekile, njengoba iNkantolo iqaphela ku Baker v. Carr (1962).
Imfundiso Yokuqagela Nemingcele Yayo
Isimiso sestare decis (isiLatin se-“ma kuvumelana nezinto ezinqunyiwe”) sidinga izinkantolo ukuba zilandele izinqumo ezidlule lapho zinquma izinqumo ezifanayo. Icala likhuthaza ukuzinza, ukungaguquguquki, nokungakhethi, liqinisekise ukuthi umthetho awungaphansi kwemibono yabahluleli ngabanye. INkantolo Ephakeme ivame ukuhlonipha izenzakalo zayo, kodwa ayiboshelwanga ngokuphelele yizo. Ezimweni ezingavamile, iNkanto eyenzekayo uma ingazange isebenze, uma icabanga kwayo sekuqediwe yizenzakalo ezilandelayo, noma inephutha.
Izinzuzo Zokulandela Isiqalo
- Ukukholeka nokwethulwa:[ Izakhamuzi namabhizinisi kungathembela kumthetho ozinzile lapho kuhlelwa izindaba zazo. Ngokwesibonelo, izivumelwano zezentengiselwano zihlelwa ngokusekelwe ezincazelweni ezimiswe kahle zomthetho wesivumelwano.
- [[QULT: 0] Ukulingana nokulingana:[ Amacala afanayo kufanele aphathwe ngendlela efanayo, avimbele imiphumela ebolile noma ewubandlululo. I-precedenting iqinisekisa ukuthi izimiso ezingokomthetho zisebenza njalo ngapha nangapha kwemicu ehlukene.
- [ Ukuphumelela okungokwezehlulelo: Ngokunamathela esibonelweni esisandulela, izinkantolo zigwema ukuphakamisa imibuzo exazululiwe, ukulondoloza imithombo yokwahlulela nokunciphisa ukulibala.
Lapho Ucasu Seludlulele
I-Starde decisis ayiwona umyalo ongaguquguqukiyo. INkantolo Ephakeme iye yazinqumela ngokwayo ngezenzakalo eziningana ezibalulekile, ngokuvamile ngenxa yezimo ezishintshiwe noma izinguquko ezijulile ekuchazeni umthetho. Izimpawu eziphawuleka kakhulu zihlanganisa:
- IWest Coost Hotel Co. v. Parrish (1937): Ithathelwe umthetho i-Adkins v. Izingane ze Hospital[ [1923] futhi zisekele umthetho weholo eliphansi kahulumeni, ophawula ukuphela kwenqubo enzima yezezomnotho.
- Brown v. Board of Education (1954): ngokuphumelela i-athodd Pnecy v. Ferguson [1896]) ngendaba yobandlululo lohlanga.
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (202): Ithathelwe umthetho [[FLT:]Roe v. Wade[ kanye [[FLT]][FLT]] Parenthoous v. Casey [1992], i-preset yokukhipha isisu ezindaweni.
Isinqumo sokubusa asithathwa kalula futhi sidinga ukucabangela ngokucophelela izithakazelo zokuncika, izinga lokucabanga kwesinqumo sangaphambili, nokuziphendukela komthetho nomphakathi.
Indima Yejadi Ekuchazeni Ngokuqondisa
Ngaphandle kwemithetho, amajaji achaza futhi imithetho ekhishwa yizinhlangano zezombuso. Izinhlangano ze-Federal njenge-Evironmental Protection Agency noma i-Securities and Exchange Commission zikha imithetho eningiliziwe yokusebenzisa imithetho ebanzi. Izinkantolo kumelwe zinqume ukuthi lemithetho ivumelana yini nomthetho ogunyaziwe nokuthi isetshenziswa ngezimiso ezifanele yini.
Ukumelana Nencazelo Ye - agency
Ngaphansi kwesimiso esimisiwe ku- ICHEVron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. [19984], izinkantolo ngokuvamile zilandela incazelo enengqondo yenhlangano yesinqumo esinikezwayo. ICHEVron [[[FLT:]] [indlela ebanzi] [i-FLT] [indlela] ezimbili] ukuhlola kudinga abahluleli bokuqala ukuthi iBhungane ngokuqondile yini; uma inkantolo kumelwe inikeze umphumela obekwe ngokungacacile. Uma umthetho uthulile noma ucacile, inkantolo kumelwe isekele ukuchazwa kwenhlangano isikhathi eside njengoba inengqondo. Lenhlangano inikeza igunya eliphawulekayo, kodwa idingiselwe kancane kancane. [kuyi-F.4]
Ikusasa le [[QLT:0]Chevron Ukungavumelani
INkantolo Ephakeme iphinde iphinde ihlole Imfundiso emacaleni ayindilile (umz., Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo). Ithuba lokubukeza kakhulu noma ukubukeza okukhulu [[FLT]] CHEVron angasusa amandla ezinhlangano abuyele emuva emuva eJudiary, ashintshe ukulinganisela phakathi kwamagatsha kahulumeni ezindabeni ezi-Regatement.
Umphumela Wokuchaza Ukwahlulela Emzabalazweni
Izinqumo zokwahlulela azenzeki ngaphandle kokuzicabangela; zithuthukisa inqubo yezenhlalo, zivikela amalungelo abantu, futhi zithonya umphakathi.
Ukuvikela Amalungelo Abantu Ngabodwa
I - Bill of Rights neSichibiyelo se - 14th Inqubo ka Claus elindelekile ne - Aumetic Protectiones inikeza izinkantolo amandla okuvikela inkululeko eyisisekelo. Ngokwesibonelo:
- [[INKANTLO:0] Mira v. Arizona (196): INkantolo yaphetha ngokuthi isiMithende sesihlanu sidinga amaphoyisa ukuba azise abasoli belungelo labo lokuthula kanye neseluleko. Umphumela izixwayiso seziyisibonakaliso esivamile senqubo yobugebengu baseMelika.
- Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) (2015: INkantolo yaqaphela ilungelo lomthetho-sisekelo lomshado ofanayo wobulili ngaphansi kweNkathi elindelekile neSivikelo esilinganayo u-Claus, iguqula kakhulu umthetho womkhaya nokwamukelwa komphakathi.
- [FLT][FORN]Bostock v. County [20]): Isivikelo sesihloko VII sokuvikela i-LGBTQ+ izisebenzi, iNkantolo yanquma isifunda esisulelwe isikhathi eside esahlukanisiwe futhi yaqinisekisa ukuthi ubandlululo olusekelwe ekufunekeni kocansi aluvunyelwe ngokomthetho.
Ukuwohloka Kwesimiso Somphakathi
Incazelo yokwahlulela ingaphoqelela futhi ushintsho lwenqubo ezindaweni ezinjengemithetho yendawo ezungezile, ukwahlulela kobugebengu, namalungelo okuvota. Ngokwesibonelo, Shelby County v. Homer (2013) (2013) iphebeza ilungiselelo eliyinhloko le-Voting Rights Act, iguqula ukuqondisa kwemithetho kahulumeni yokukhetha futhi iholele ekubekeleni imingcele entsha yokuvota emazweni amasha. Ngokuphikisana ne-, [Massachusetts v. [200]] (2007]) ikholelwa ukuthi i-Cecwooc Air act yanikeza igunya lokulawula amagesi okufudula, ihomu lenhlangano lokulawula isimo sezulu.
Izinselele Ezibhekene Nezingoma Zanamuhla
Naphezu kwendima yalo ebucayi, ikomiti yokwahlulela ibhekana nezinselele ezinkulu ezivivinya ukuzibusa nokuphumelela kwayo.
Ukuziphatha Okuhle Nokuthenjwa Umphakathi
Ukumiswa kokwahlulela kuye kwaba nokukhetha okukhulu, futhi izimpi zokuqinisekisa ngokuvamile zibonisa ukuhlukana okujulile kwemibono. Umphakathi uya ubheka iNkantolo Ephakeme ngokubheka nge-lens yezombangazwe; ukuhlola kuka-2023 kukaGallup kwathola ukuthi amaphesenti angu-40 kuphela amaMelika avumela ukusebenza kweNkantolo, cishe kuphansi kakhulu ngokomlando. Imibono yokukhetha okungokoqobo noma okucatshangelwayo − ukufaneleka kwejadicimine nekhono layo lokulawula izinqumo zayo.
Ukuquliswa Kwamacala Nemithombo Yokwahlulela
Izinkantolo ze-Federal zisingatha amacala angaphezu kuka-400 000 ngonyaka, kuyilapho izinkantolo zikahulumeni zisingatha izigidi. Ukuthwebula amacala okusinda kungaholela ekulibaleni, kunciphise isikhathi abahluleli abasichitha ecaleni ngalinye, futhi kwandise ukuthembela konobhala bezomthetho nabameli abasebenza. Ukuthola imithombo eyanele nabaphathi abaphumelelayo bamacala kubalulekile ukuze kulondolozwe izinga lobulungisa.
Ukuyinkimbinkimbi Komthetho Wanamuhla
Njengoba imithetho nezimiso zikhula ngobuchwepheshe obuningi — ukuhlanganisa izindawo ezinjenge - Internetsectecrive, ukuhlakanipha kokwenziwa, kanye nesayensi yezinto eziphilayo − izahlulelo kumelwe zibe nobuchwepheshe noma zincike ebufakazini obungochwepheshe. umsebenzi wokuchaza uba nzima kakhulu lapho imithetho inikeza izinhlangano zokuqondisa ukuhlakanipha okukhulu, idinga ukuba izinkantolo zisebenzise izinqubo eziyinkimbinkimbi zokuqondisa.
Ikusasa Lokuchazwa Kokwahlulela
Izahlulelo zizoqhubeka ziguquka njengoba zibhekene nemibuzo emisha engokomthetho neshintshashintshayo kwezenhlalo.
Ubuchwepheshe Nomthetho
Izinkantolo zicelwa ngokwandayo ukuba zichaze imithetho esekelwe ebuchwephesheni bezokusebenza. Impikiswano enjengokungafihliwe kwemininingwane ye-data, ukulunga kwemithetho, kanye nobubanzi beSichibiyelo sesine enkathini yobuchwepheshe ziphindaphindwa ngezihloko. Isinqumo seNkantolo Ephakeme Carpater v. United States [2017], eyayithi uhulumeni udinga isiqinisekiso sokuthola indawo yocingo, izimpawu zokuvumelanisa izimiso zomthetho nezobuchwepheshe.
Umthetho Wezizwe Zonke Nokulinganisa
Nakuba ikomiti yamajaji yaseU.S. ingavamile ukuncika emthethweni wakwamanye amazwe, izenzakalo zomthetho wembulunga yonke zingazisa ukuchazwa kwezindawo zasekhaya, ikakhulukazi ezindaweni ezinjengamalungelo abantu nokuhwebelana.
Ukuzimela Kokwahlulela Nezinguquko
Izimfuneko zokuguqula inkantolo yamajaji − njengemingcele yamajaji eNkantolo Ephakeme, ukwandisa inani lamajaji, noma ukusebenzisa isimiso esibophayo sezimiso zokuhluza ngokwanda kwamandla nenhlalo. Noma yiziphi izinguquko zingaba nezimiphumela ejulile ekuchazeni kwendlela yokwahlulela, njengokushintsha isimo sejaji elisebenza ngayo.
Ukubaluleka Okuqhubekayo Kokuzimela Ekwahluleleni
Igcinela ukukhululeka kwejaji ekucindezeleni kwezombangazwe, umbono womphakathi, namanye amagatsha kubalulekile ekubuseni umthetho. Amajaji azimele angakhipha izinqumo zokungakhethi ezisekelwe ekufanelekeni okungokomthetho, ngisho noma lezo zinqumo zingathandwa. Ukuvikela okunjengokuphila kubahluleli bamazwe (ngaphansi kweSiphakamiso III) kanye nesivikelo ekuncishisweni kweholo kuyasiza ekulondolozeni lokhu kukhululeka, kodwa kumelwe kuvikelwe ngokucophelela.
Isiphetho
Indima yejadicary ekuchazeni umthetho nemithetho isekelwe ekubuseni kwemibuso yentando yeningi yaseMelika. Ngokufushaniswa komthetho-sisekelo, ukwakhiwa kwemithetho, nokubukezwa kwezenzo zokuphatha, izinkantolo ziqinisekisa ukuthi umthetho uyaqhubeka uvumelana, ulungile, futhi uvumelana nezimiso ezisunguliwe zesizwe. Izindlela zokuchaza (i-profectionismsme, i-jognalism), noma i-aprivivoism (ukungadingida), ukuphikisana okuhlala njalo mayelana nesimo samandla okwahlulela. Izinselele zokuguqula izikhali, ushintsho lwezobuchwepheshe, kanye nemithombo yemali ziyovivinya ukuqina kwezwe, kodwa ukuzimisela kwalo ukuhlaziya nokunamathela kokunquma indlela elandelwayo kunikeza indlela engaphambili. Njengoba ushintsho nomphakathi luqhubeka, i-judiary ihlala inselele ebaluleke kakhulu ekulondolozeni ukuhleleni komthetho womthetho womthetho womthetho womthetho womthetho, ukuchaza izinjongo womthetho womthetho kanye nezinjongo zawo eziwugcina.
[[UMTL:0] ukuze uqhubeke ufunda, bheka:[[Umthetho:1]